A lot is said positively about Tailwind CSS - however, it is worth considering its drawbacks

In the article by Aleksandr Hovhannisyan, the author shares his thoughts on Tailwind CSS, a popular styling framework for web applications. Hovhannisyan outlines several reasons why he is not a fan of this tool. Firstly, he criticizes the approach to styling that requires developers to write CSS classes directly in HTML tags, which can lead to complexity and difficulties in maintaining the code. He points out that using Tailwind can result in a messy codebase and challenges in understanding what styles are applied to individual elements.

Another point raised by the author is that Tailwind CSS can promote code readability issues, as classes are often long and complex to comprehend. Hovhannisyan emphasizes that the use of numerous classes in HTML might affect rendering performance, which is an important factor to consider when designing applications. Moreover, he notes that when using Tailwind, development teams may lose visual consistency since each developer might introduce their own classes, leading to a lack of uniformity in styling.

Hovhannisyan also shares his experiences with projects where he used Tailwind, showing that despite its popularity, personal preferences might lead developers to choose other tools. The article poses questions about whether sticking to more traditional styling methods, such as CSS or CSS preprocessors, can help maintain order and clarity in code. As the author highlights, the choice of a styling framework should be tailored to the needs of the team and the specifics of the project rather than relying solely on current trends.

In summary, the article draws attention to a personal perspective on Tailwind CSS and encourages reflection on the choice of tools in the application development process. It's essential to remember that every framework has its strengths and weaknesses, and finding the right balance between usability and simplicity is key. The author suggests that developers should seek solutions that support their work rather than following the trend of one specific solution that may prove ineffective in the long run.