AWS vs Bare Metal After 2 Years - Full Numbers, Architecture, and Responses to Criticism

The article "AWS to Bare Metal: Two Years Later" discusses the evolution of moving from cloud services like Amazon Web Services (AWS) to physical servers. The author points out that over the past two years, organizations have begun to realize the benefits associated with bare metal infrastructure, which can provide better performance and reduced latency. In particular, connections to physical servers allow for greater control over resources, which is crucial for applications requiring intensive data processing. Additionally, the increased data privacy and security that comes with owning physical servers are arguments that attract many companies to change their IT strategy. The author also discusses cost issues, indicating that while initial investments in bare metal may be higher, long-term savings may outweigh the costs of maintaining cloud infrastructure. However, this transition is not without challenges associated with managing infrastructure and the need for a technical team to handle bare metal. Therefore, it is essential to carefully consider the decision to migrate to physical servers in order to fully grasp the advantages and disadvantages of this strategy. Understanding the specifics of application requirements and potential future technological developments can significantly impact a company's final IT strategy decisions.