Clean code and refactoring old functions is not always worth it

In his article "Goodbye, Clean Code," Dan Abramov points out that while the principles of clean code are important, adhering to them too strictly can lead to complications. Clean code, which should be readable and understandable to other developers, can become a source of frustration when its rules are too rigid. The author reminds us that code should primarily work and be optimized during actual use, not just in theory. When developers design new features, those should be the priority, not perfecting existing code. Too much focus on coding style can stifle creativity and innovation, which is counter to the spirit of programming.

Dan encourages readers to focus on the actual value of the code and its functionality. The daunting vision of perfect code often prevents developers from introducing innovative solutions. Instead of striving for ideal clean code, we should aim for creating useful and functional applications. Collaboration within a team and collective work on the code should take precedence over whether the code adheres to some theoretical cleanliness rules. Joint discussions about the code can lead to better understanding and the discovery of new ideas.

Moreover, Abramov emphasizes that the software development process involves more than just writing code. It also includes understanding user problems and quickly adapting to their needs. Programmers need to be flexible in their approaches and not be afraid to make changes that will yield better results. Stiff rules only block progress and make the process less enjoyable.

It’s essential to be aware of the balance between clean code and project requirements. Sometimes, overly focusing on code quality can lead to delays in delivering value to the customer. It’s crucial to remember that the ultimate goal is to meet the client's needs and develop the product rather than enforcing perfect programming practices. Actual working code has more value than code that is clean but useless.

In conclusion, Dan Abramov reminds us that clean code has its place but shouldn’t be the goal in itself. The key is to adapt to real needs and project demands rather than sticking rigidly to clean code principles. Programmers should be open to change to create better and more functional applications. Ultimately, programming should be a source of joy and satisfaction, not just a fulfillment of norms.