Clean Code - Every Programmer's Goal? Or Is It Really?

In the article "Goodbye, Clean Code", author Dan Abramov shares his thoughts on the practice of "clean code". While clean code is often considered the gold standard of programming, Abramov points out some limitations of this philosophy. Firstly, the principles of clean code can be somewhat subjective and may vary depending on the context of the project and the team involved. Instead of striving for perfection, programmers should focus on utility and flexibility in their code. This focus is especially essential in today's dynamic tech world, where changes are inevitable.

Abramov also notes that, in everyday tasks, there is no one-size-fits-all solution to every problem. Ultimately, what works in one instance may not work in another. It is crucial for programmers to remember that their primary aim is to deliver value, not just code aesthetics. Achieving that value requires adaptability and the ability to respond to project needs.

He emphasizes the importance of practical experiences, which can teach us more than the principles of clean code. He also discusses how difficult and unpleasant it can be to live by meta-rules that restrict creativity and innovation. In many cases, techniques that are seen as 'dirty code' can be just as valuable, provided they address real-world issues.

In conclusion, Abramov expresses the opinion that it is essential for the approach to writing code to be more contextual and less rigidly adhered to. Such an approach can lead to better programming and more effective teams. In reality, sometimes the best solutions arise from experiments and learning from mistakes rather than from strictly following rules. As technology evolves, so does our approach to code flexibility and programming as a whole.