Monolith, microservices, or maybe serverless? What to choose?

In the article about monoliths, microservices, and serverless architectures, the author discusses the key differences between these three approaches to building applications. The first part of the comparison focuses on monoliths, which are integrated applications functioning as a single unit. Due to their simplicity and ease of deployment, monoliths can be ideal for small projects. However, their drawback is the difficulty in scaling and adding new features, which can lead to problems in the long run.

Next, the author transitions to microservices, which address some of the issues present in monolithic architecture. Microservices allow for building applications as collections of smaller, independent services that can be developed and deployed separately. This flexible approach enables teams to innovate and enhance systems more quickly, but it comes with added complexity in managing such a system.

The article also discusses the serverless approach, which has become increasingly popular in recent years. In a serverless architecture, developers can focus on writing code, while cloud providers handle the infrastructure. This approach can significantly reduce operational costs, as you pay only for the resources used. Yet, similar to microservices, it presents new challenges related to monitoring and managing functions.

Additionally, the author touches on the topic of choosing the right architecture in relation to business and technical goals. It emphasizes that there is no one-size-fits-all solution for every project, and decisions should be made based on the specific needs and constraints of a given application. Moreover, it's essential to consider the future of technology, which may bring new approaches or improvements to existing models.

In conclusion, each of the discussed models has its advantages and disadvantages, and choosing the right approach depends on the specific project and the resources available to the development team. It is crucial to understand which elements of each architecture can best support the application’s goals and how to implement them effectively in practice.