Recenzja "Rabbit R1" - kolejny, fizyczny asystent AI (film, 20m)
W najnowszym filmie Marquesa Browna, zatytułowanym "Rabbit R1: AI w pudełku", recenzuje nową urządzenie AI, który staje się popularny wśród entuzjastów technologii. Rabbit R1 jest małym, przenośnym urządzeniem, porównywalnym do rozmiaru stosu karteczek samoprzylepnych, zaprojektowanym przez Teenage Engineering. W przeciwieństwie do Humane AI pin, Rabbit R1 ma intelektualne funkcje AI oraz ekran, który pokazuje wyniki zapytań. Umożliwia to użytkownikowi zadawanie pytań oraz uzyskiwanie szybkich odpowiedzi z chmury. Mimo że urządzenie ma na celu ułatwienie życia użytkownika, jego działanie nadal pozostawia wiele do życzenia.
W filmie Marques zwraca uwagę na szybkość odpowiedzi Rabbit R1 w porównaniu z Humane AI pin, mówiąc, że urządzenie wydaje się odpowiadać szybciej, nawet jeśli i tak często popełnia błędy. Obsługuje Bluetooth mogąc połączyć słuchawki, a także wyświetla tekst odpowiedzi na ekranie tuż obok bouncing rabbit - animacji, która sygnalizuje, że urządzenie jest aktywne. Marques omawia również interfejs użytkownika, w tym charakterystyczne pokrętło do przewijania i obracającą się kamerę, przy okazji zauważając, że obsługa interfejsu jest mniej intuicyjna niż oczekiwano.
Marques wyraża rozczarowanie żywotnością baterii Rabbit R1, która wynosi zaledwie cztery godziny. Oznacza to, że użytkownicy muszą ładować urządzenie kilka razy dziennie. Dodatkowo, jego funkcje są dość ograniczone; nie jest w stanie ustawić alarmów, timerów czy robić zdjęć. Zauważa także, że wielu użytkowników może być sfrustrowanych niewielką liczbą dostępnych aplikacji, ponieważ na początku oferuje jedynie cztery półfunkcjonalne aplikacje, podczas gdy obiecano znacznie więcej.
Marques zwraca uwagę, że Rabbit R1 ma swoją cenę, znacznie mniejszą niż konkurencyjny Humane AI pin, co czyni go bardziej przystępnym rozwiązaniem. Kosztuje 200 dolarów, co sprawia, że niektóre osoby mogą być skłonne zaryzykować zakup w nadziei, że w przyszłości urządzenie zostanie poprawione. W swoim filmie Marques podkreśla frustrującą tendencję w branży technologicznej, gdzie firmy często wypuszczają niedokończone produkty, pozostawiając użytkowników w niepewności co do obiecanego wsparcia i przyszłych aktualizacji.
Na chwilę obecną Rabbit R1 posiada ponad 8.6 miliona wyświetleń i 241,000 polubień, co świadczy o wysokim zainteresowaniu zarówno urządzeniem, jak i jego obowiązkową recenzją. Marques Brownlee pozostaje krytyczny, ale także zaintrygowany przyszłym potencjałem Rabbit R1 i jego AI, zauważając, że proces polepszenia urządzeń może czasem być powolny. Kończąc swoją analizę, wyraża nadzieję, że częściowe wprowadzenie nowych technologii i idea dużych modeli akcji przyciągnie uwagę większych graczy jak Google i Apple, którzy mogą to rozwijać w przyszłości. Także użytkownicy powinni pamiętać, aby kupować urządzenia według ich aktualnych możliwości, a nie przyszłych obietnic.
Toggle timeline summary
-
Wprowadzenie urządzenia Rabbit R1 jako urządzenia AI.
-
Porównanie z Humane AI pin, zauważając podobieństwa.
-
Opis rozmiaru i przenośności urządzenia.
-
Design i rozpoznawalność Rabbit R1.
-
Funkcje takie jak wbudowany ekran i zależność od chmury.
-
Opcje łączności, w tym Bluetooth.
-
Interakcja przez naciśnięcia przycisków i potrząsanie w celu zmiany ustawień.
-
Wykorzystanie AI do zadawania pytań wizualnych i rozpoznawania obiektów.
-
Podkreślenie zdolności urządzenia do identyfikacji roślin.
-
Krytyka krótkiego czasu pracy na baterii i braku podstawowych funkcji.
-
Dyskusja na temat halucynacji i błędnych odpowiedzi od AI.
-
Frustracje związane z nawigacją za pomocą pokrętła przewijania.
-
Ograniczenia funkcjonalności ekranu dotykowego.
-
Skupienie na cenie urządzenia jako punkcie sprzedaży.
-
Porównanie z drogim Humane AI pin.
-
Brak aplikacji i funkcji na urządzeniu.
-
Wprowadzenie czterech aplikacji dostępnych do użycia z urządzeniem.
-
Potrzeba większej ilości danych treningowych dla lepszej wydajności aplikacji.
-
Zapowiedź przyszłych funkcji, takich jak tryb nauczania, wciąż w opracowaniu.
-
Obawy dotyczące trendu wprowadzania niedokończonych produktów technologicznych.
-
Ciepłe myśli na temat przyszłości asystentów AI i rozwoju Rabbita.
-
Zachęta do oceny produktów na podstawie aktualnych funkcji.
-
Konkluzja i podziękowania dla widowni.
Transcription
So this is the Rabbit R1, and it's another AI in a box, and it's a sign of the times. So this thing here, it has a lot in common with the Humane AI pin, for better or for worse, but it's also supposed to have two specific things that are supposed to set it apart from that. Supposed to, anyway. And we have to talk about it. So stop me if this sounds familiar at any point, but check this out. This is a virtual assistant in a box, but it's a different box. This one is not wearable. It's a thing you have to carry around with you in your pocket, like a smartphone. I'd say it's about the size of a stack of Post-Its, maybe, but it's this lightweight plastic cube designed by Teenage Engineering, and boy, do people love some Teenage Engineering right now. And it's super, I mean, you can tell exactly what it is from a mile away. This thing is very recognizable. The thing has one button on the right side. That's the one you press and hold to ask it questions. And then instead of a projector, it actually does have a built-in screen here. And instead of built-in cellular, it has a SIM card tray right alongside that USB Type-C port for charging. I'd say it does seem to send basically every single request to the cloud, but I will say it does feel significantly quicker to answer questions than the Humane AI pin. Now that is a very, very low bar to clear, but it is consistent. It's consistently quicker. How far away is the moon? The average distance between Earth and the moon is approximately 384,400 kilometers. You can connect headphones via Bluetooth or turn the built-in speaker all the way up like I have, but it also shows you the text of your answer on the screen right underneath this bouncing rabbit and the time in the battery. Matter of fact, it basically always shows this bouncing rabbit all the time. That's how you know it's awake. You hit that button once to put it to sleep, or it would do that automatically after a few seconds. Then hit the button again to wake it up, boom, just the rabbit waiting for you there. And then to get to settings, there's no button to press for that. There's no gesture on the screen or anything. You just shake it like an Etch-a-Skish. As long as you do that, then from there, you can scroll up and down with this scroll wheel and select with the button. That's how you get around the UI. The other two things it has are the scroll wheel and a swiveling camera. The scroll wheel for navigating around the UI instead of the screen is, I'll get to why it's odd in a second, but then of course, the AI assistant is multimodal, and so you can use vision to answer questions about what it sees. We've seen this before. With this one, you double tap to swivel it open and then press and hold to ask, I don't know, what type of plant is this? Taking a look now, the plant in the image appears to be a Monstera deliciosa, also known as a Swiss cheese plant. This is a type of tropical climbing evergreen plant native to Southern Mexico and parts of Central America. The large glossy green leaves with distinctive... As a reviewer testing this thing, I just feel like that DJ Khaled clip after a while where I'm just pointing at stuff like, okay, what is this? And what is this? And what is this? And what is this? And perhaps what is this? But I've also, I've just pointed it at my computer screen with a really long email on it and asked it for a summary and it just reads it instantly and gives me a summary of it. It's done that with articles too. I think that's pretty cool. But yeah, it's just a, it's an AI in a box. It's best at just answering questions. So yeah, this thing is also bad at a lot of stuff. And this, this list is going to sound pretty familiar. Somehow the battery life is just as bad as the humane pin. It has a thousand milliamp hour battery inside and it's brutally bad. Like it's already bad enough when you're carrying around a whole nother device alongside your smartphone. But when this one can sit in front of you doing nothing and the battery just visibly is draining and dies in like four hours, then you have to charge it multiple times per day and it's still dead when you wake up in the morning. Like it's just exhausting. So it took 45 minutes to charge this tiny battery from zero to a hundred. And it's also just straight up missing a ton of what I would consider just basic features like they can't set alarms, can't set timers. It can't record videos, can't record photos, can't send emails. There's no calendar built in. There's just a lot of things that I would want an assistant to do. Not here. And of course, being an AI assistant, it also does still hallucinate and confidently answer questions wrong. Like my baseline of asking a question that I know the answer to, and then getting the wrong answer happens all the time, which is one of the downfalls of this category. So this device was designed by Teenage Engineering and they're really leaning into that. Like that's why, I mean, it's this bright orange, it is really quirky, friendly looking device, I would say intentionally. But yeah, they're really love their analog controls. This scroll wheel here doesn't surprise me, but it's actually really frustrating to use. First of all, it protrudes out the back a little bit, as you can see, which looks kind of cool, but that means if it was really sensitive that it would actually scroll if you just put it down on a table or something. So they've dialed down the sensitivity of the scroll wheel. So it's actually super slow. Like there's a surprising amount of scroll motion required to go down one line in the settings. And then there's no haptic feedback here as they're scrolling to help you feel it out. So fine, okay, you can get used to that. You use the button to select, but then you've also noticed there's no back button anywhere on this device. So to go back up a level, you have to scroll all the way back up to the top every single time. That also gets annoying. And then to change brightness or volume, you actually need two hands. So you just go into brightness to select and you hold the button with one hand and then scroll the scroll wheel with the other hand to adjust brightness, which, yeah, you just, you can't do it with one hand. It works, so you can learn it and you can say, you know, it's this quirky UI it's got going on. But I feel like a lot of these problems would be solved if this was a touchscreen. So what if I told you this is a touchscreen and they just don't really let you use it for almost anything? Like moving through these menus would be easier if I could just tap what I wanted to, right? So scrolling back after a long scroll would be easier if I could just flip scroll back to the top of a list and hit back. But you can't. The only thing you can use the touchscreen for is basically typing on the keyboard in terminal mode. So with terminal enabled, you can turn it sideways, a keyboard pops up and you can type your questions and get text answers, which is great. And you can move between letters with the scroll wheel. It's kind of a neat feature, I guess. But why can't we use the touchscreen for anything else? Is it just them trying not to look too much like a smartphone? Maybe. Probably. So, OK, what's the point? Why does this thing exist? If it's so similar to the other one that was also so bad, what are we doing here? And really, there's two things that I think they're hoping will be the things that set it apart from the other one that should, in the words of their co-founder, Jesse. I don't think MPVHD will say this is the worst device he ever reviewed so far. Which low bar, but OK, those two things are the price tag and the large action model. So the humane pin was so easy for everyone to dunk on because it was it cost as much as a phone. It was seven hundred dollars with a twenty four dollar a month subscription to not turn into a brick. It's just insane. So this one right here costs two hundred dollars and no subscription. So OK, that it's a little different, but also you can tell it's two hundred dollars. First of all, you will need a separate SIM card to get it to work on cellular. So while there is no subscription fee for Rabbit to keep the device working, that is still a fee you're going to pay every month to get data outside of Wi-Fi. But then, OK, the unboxing experience is extremely minimal. It comes in a single cardboard box with a cassette tape looking plastic container that doubles as a stand. But there's literally nothing else. No charging brick, no USB-C cable, no stickers, no paper instruction manual, nothing at all. And then the R1 itself is made of plastic. Not to say that it's not built well, you know, there's no flexing or creaking or anything like that, but it's definitely plastic. The camera, very basic. The speaker, very cheap. You know, it's a low end MediaTek chip inside the same one that's in the Moto G8 Power Lite, which is like a hundred fifty dollar phone. Hardly any battery, as we learned, and no fancy fast charging or wireless charging. And it comes in one color, really bright orange, like this ridiculously saturated bright orange. I'm not even joking. The color you're seeing in this YouTube video on your screen, it's going to be the best I can do with my own color correction, but it's legitimately hard to photograph. The phone camera doesn't really turn saturation up high enough to really represent it accurately in real life. It's the brightest orange thing you've ever seen in your life, I guarantee it. Now, if you want something a little more low key than the neon orange, channel sponsor dbrand actually does have you covered here. I've got this black camo looking one here, and now the orange bits that show through are kind of like more accent pieces, which is pretty dope. But fun fact, dbrand also collaborated with Rabbit ahead of the release to make sure screen protectors for this thing were also available on launch day. So that includes mine. If you want to check it out, screen protectors or skins for the R1, you can hit up the link below. But yeah, speaking of the screen, this is a 2.9 inch diagonal TFT screen with no auto brightness. So, yeah, I think you get the idea. So you know how the Humane AI pen had no apps? Well, this thing also has no apps, but the other thing that they're hoping will separate it from the other stuff is what they're calling a large action model. So, you know, large language models are just the words, the language that we use. So it's an AI that can take our natural language and process it and turn it into words in return. And that's how we interact with it. So a large action model is supposed to take our words and then process it and turn it into actions. That's the theory. So it's basically going to be able to use apps for you like a human would based on what you tell it to do. Now, importantly, this isn't the same as an API where, you know, a company might work with the others to have some sort of a plug into their services that they work together because an API can be a little too restrictive or not give all the features or just not quite. I mean, there's lots of good reasons why they don't want to rely on an API. So what this is supposed to be doing is just going in and using the app just like a human essentially with like a mouse and a keyboard. Think of it as like a virtual agent. Honestly, I think it's a really cool idea. I think it's a really, really cool idea. You know, large language models have been trained with all their data to talk back to us just like humans would and some are very convincing. So a large action model in theory should be able to use these apps and services just like a human would from Spotify to Twitter to your banking app to whatever else. It's already good enough at recognizing major UI elements like a play button or a buy button and things like that. So with enough training data to get really good. With enough training data to get really good. But the thing is, they don't have a ton of training data yet. So as of right now, they have made four apps available for they have this online portal called the rabbit hole where you can log into and enable all of them. Spotify, Uber, DoorDash and Mid Journey. So the rabbit can talk to these four apps and has a UI on the screen for doing so in the exact way that we're theorizing. So it'll play Spotify songs like I can ask it for a song and it'll try to play the right one and it'll show you any info you need on the touchscreen to confirm or refine the actions you're taking. So as of right now, they kind of work like I've already had issues with it playing the wrong song. I've also seen other people already have issues with the DoorDash app getting things wrong, which is even more frustrating. I can't imagine how frustrating the Uber app messing up would be. It definitely seems like it needs more training data. And that's just for these four starting apps. Now rabbit says they have 800 different apps trained already, but they just haven't built a UI for it yet. So it's not available on the rabbit yet. And so that's still in the works. Now they've also theoretically started working on something called a generative UI, where essentially it can recognize what type of app it is and then build a UI for it so rabbit doesn't have to. But that's also still theoretical and also on the roadmap and still in the works. And then if there's another app or service that you want your rabbit to be able to do, like some something for work or something super niche that you've invented, they've talked about something called teach mode, which is basically having the rabbit watch you do what you want it to do on your mouse and keyboard. And then it learns from what you did, and it can then repeat your actions later, which is sick. Unfortunately, you can probably already see where this is going. Teach mode is also not available as of right now, this is something they're still working on vetting and finishing. And so that's just later this year, also in the works. So as of right now, this device has none of that stuff. Just the four kind of half working apps that we went over at the beginning. What are we doing here? Okay, I'm going to try not to turn this into a rant, but I just I feel like we need to acknowledge at least that a lot of these tech companies are developing tech kind of backwards, like they're delivering such unfinished products that it actually makes them nearly impossible to review. Like it feels like it used to just be make the thing, and then put it on sale. Now it's like, put it on sale, and then deliver the half baked thing and then iterate and make it better. And hopefully with enough updates, then it's it's ready. And it's what we promised way back when we first started selling it. And then this, this whole period in the middle is a mess. And it's across all kinds of product categories, too. We've seen this with gaming, like huge studios are delivering half baked games saying, oh, you know, it's an alpha version, like there will be updates. But meanwhile, it's a full price AAA game that's just got an unacceptable number of bugs and issues. It's also happening with cars and vehicles getting announced and then delivering with like a half finished state, where you just don't get a lot of the features that you paid for and they're eventually coming soon with a software update. You know, smartphones, obviously, we've been seeing this for years. But it does seem like now more than ever, there's at least one feature, one major feature of every smartphone launch that gets announced. But that's not coming until later in the year. And now these AI based products are at like the apex of this horrible trend where the thing that you get at the beginning is like, borderline non functional, compared to all the promises and all the features and all the things that it's supposed to maybe someday be. But you still pay full price at the beginning, which is what makes it so crazy. And that sucks not only obviously for the people buying it at full price at the beginning, but also for reviewing these things in general. Like how do you assess a product where the version of what's promised in like three years what it could be is amazing. But the version that's being delivered now is dog water. Like how, how do you connect those dots? Do you even connect those dots? Are you supposed to give them the benefit of the doubt? I don't know. What are we even doing here? I mean, I guess on one hand, it is good that tech products, these things can get better over time and improve and the thing you buy can be better tomorrow. That's all great. That didn't used to be true. And that's beautiful and everything. But it on the other hand, it's just the other side of that coin is some very unfinished products being delivered. And I just feel like it's gonna get worse before it gets better. So let me just say, I am personally very excited by the idea of a super personalized AI assistant that can do everything that a human assistant could. That's my, that's my dream. I want that to happen. And I'm interested that these different companies are approaching it from different angles. And hopefully we'll get there eventually, but this is also so clearly going to take a lot of time and effort and technical development and also a lot of data. Like I've said this already in the Humane Review, I'm pretty sure, which is a good assistant needs to know everything about you, whether it's human or virtual, like it needs to know your preferences and your location and what you're doing and what you like to do and every single little thing. It's so much data. So as for the rabbit, I think that's why they focused on getting the price so low. Like this stuff is all a tough sell because you're taking a gamble on what the product could be someday. For the pin, you have to drop $700 and $24 every month on the chance that it might someday get there. Like that's a lot of money. But for this cute little thing, 200 bucks feels like a much easier investment to make a much easier pill to swallow, to just take a gamble on it. And on the off chance, it turns out to be awesome in a couple of years, it'll feel like it's worth it. You know, on the chance that some of those 800 apps are super useful, or, you know, even though you already have a smartphone, maybe the teach mode lets it do something with a single button press that you could never dream of before, then it could be totally worth it. The whole situation reminds me kind of of, if you, if you look back at the beginning of when Tesla started shipping cars with all the autopilot stuff, they were selling cars and they got popular for other reasons. It was a good electric car with good range and good charging network. And then people started sort of beta testing this autopilot stuff and Tesla starts collecting millions of miles and hours of data from how it works in the real world. And so all of that data helped their systems learn and get the headstart that they need on trying to make the best autopilot software. So the rabbit, I'm sure would like to use their price advantage and get as many of them out into the real world as possible into people's hands so they can start beta testing and having it trained and getting good at a variety of tasks. But the rabbit's problem is it doesn't have like the other reason why people would get it anyway today. So it's like a kind of a chicken and egg problem. So if you want my advice, you've heard it before. Buy the product based on what it is today and not what it's promised to be in the future. And with this category, that's like the hardest thing to do, the hardest thing to keep in mind because the promise is so big, but that's still my advice. And I guess we still also have yet to see what big companies like Google and Apple are going to try to do in this space probably this year. So with all of that, we'll see. Thanks for watching. Catch you in the next one. Peace.